Pants: Not Misogynist

Sometimes I feel guilty for this blog. For being flippant and light-hearted, for calling myself the Funimist.  It’s a feeling that became particularly acute when when I read recently that in some parts of the world, pop music isn’t a key indicator of the status of women. Pants are.

North Korea, land of deptosim and nukes, has set fines of around a weeks wages and hard labour as punishment for women who wear pants. The new punishments relate to a decree from 1986:

“The Dear Leader has said national character shows up not only in language, etiquette and morals but in attire as well,” the site said.

Creepy in every known way.

A second section of the article talks about the situation in Sudan, where punishment for a woman wearing pants is 40 lashes of the whip. A journo who was charged for the offence last week has been protesting her punishment, and raising a bit of a ruckus about the human rights violations involved.

Women’s bodies and attire have always been a site of custom, law and expectation, and much of second (and arguably third) waves of feminism sought to dislodge these. It is distressing, though, to see them emerge in such near-comically primitive ways.

My final thought on this issue is not about women, but about how eternally sad I am that men in western countries don’t wear skirts more often. It’s holding them back, that’s all I’m saying.  I wonder what the Dear Leader would say?


Filed under Uncategorized

2 responses to “Pants: Not Misogynist

  1. Captain Nick

    I’m not an expert on North Korean male transvestisism, but I’d imagine the price is significantly more than a firm slap.

    Now, the reason that men don’t wear dresses is because they look ridiculous.

    I cite Star Trek. Now, Gene Roddenbury, bless his socks, had the idea that in a post-racial, post-gender world, dresses would become for men as trousers are for women in the West.

    So while we have Uhura in a mini-skirt:


    …….we also have men….

    ….(EYE BLEACH)….

    Now, I think this may be nothing more than pure physiology: women have hips. Skirts flatter that curve.

    Men’s equivalent of the hip his the shoulder: suits hang from the shoulder (hence women inserting shoulder pads for cloth the hang equivalently).

    So, essentially, your argument leads to demanding men wear padded hips, in order to have the physical requirements that a fitted skirt/dress demands.

    Real men will never wear padded hips, as padding (of shoulder or breast), is the same moral equivalent as makeup, hair dying, facials etc: all tools of artifice women are required to employ because their egos are so fragile they require scaffolding.

    (I bet you didn’t see my last-minute misogynist twist coming)

  2. I’ve heard the deptosim in North Korea has gotten a lot worse over the past few years.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s